Friday, 19 December 2014
Posted by warren knight at 01:48
Thursday, 18 December 2014
Date: 14 December 2014 at 17:43
Subject: Fw: [Free Grandma Carla Buckle] Press release for immediate release
For those that do not know what the procedure is to create a warrant of arrest the following is a brief explanation.
First of all there must be an injured party: this party must have been damaged in some way; this party must make a complaint to a court of law; this complaint must be in the form of a sworn statement of truth signed under Oath and Penalty of Perjury, then handed to a court as an official complaint.
Within the court a judge (not magistrate), decides if this offense is unlawful, and if he believes it to be then signs his signature to a warrant of arrest in blue ink with his name clearly printed below his signature also in blue wet ink to identify himself. Then he stamps the warrant with the court seal to identify the issuing court. Both judge and court are then accountable for the warrant of arrest.
This genuine warrant is then given to the police to process in a lawful manner. The police arrest the offender and hold them under custody until the 'offender' is brought before a court to be found guilty or not guilty by a jury of 12 of his/her peers. Evidence must be produced and the defendant must be given the chance to defend themselves against the evidence of 'guilt' produced.
This is what happened in this case:
At 6am in the morning this woman was arrested by "Marstons" debt collectors acting on behalf of Newbury Borough Council to collect outstanding "council tax." The "warrant had no decipherable signature, only a squiggle to identify any "judge" that allegedly signed the document. There was no printing of the judges name to identify the squiggle. There was no seal of any court to identify the court that issued the warrant. This and the other anomalies mentioned below make the 'warrant' completely fake.
So, why does the council issue a fake warrant of arrest for the police to act on if council tax was obligatory? Why did they not issue their own statement of truth to a court of law? It is because ALL council tax is unlawful and NO judge would ever risk signing such a document as they know council tax is unlawful too. Read on and wonder at this huge injustice against this woman.
Danny Bamping 14 December 15:23
Press release for immediate release
Grandmother jailed Council Tax Bill she couldn’t afford
On Tuesday 18th November this year, Carla Buckle a mother of 3 and grandmother of 2 was arrested at her home at 06:30 am by 2 private bailiffs and 5 police officers – acting on behalf of West Berkshire Council.
She was then taken to Reading Magistrates Court and in hearing where the only member of the public was asked to leave, she was jailed for 56 days for non-payment of Council Tax.
Ms Buckle is now being held as a ‘civil prisoner’ in a privately run prison [HMP Bronzefield – where Rosemary West is being held] and has now served 26 days, which has meant her council tax bill of ‘£3,500’ has been reduced by £60 a day and now stands at around £1,500.
The arrest warrant used was clearly 'void in law' on its face; and there has been no due process followed and no means test completed, by neither the court nor the council. She has been denied her medication [as she’s ill], she was harmed on the way to court [hurting her knee] and has been on hunger strike for 5 days, but recently she has started eating again.
Ms Buckle is 52 and a part time carer on a zero hour’s contract; her average weekly hours are 25 hours a week at £7 an hour. After rent, bills and food she barely has £50 a week to live on.
A legal challenge [Judicial review and immediate bail application]to the sentencing failed at the High Court on Friday; although a review of that decision is likely to happen early this week.
In the meantime – West Berkshire Council have ‘gloated’ over what they have done
Family, Friends & Supporters have set up a funding campaign to help raise the money and release her.
A spokesperson for Ms Buckle stated;
“We have been invited to turn up with CASH at the prison and pay Carla’s Council Tax bill to them directly – and she will be released immediately. How utterly ridiculous in 2014 – we still have the Poor Laws in operation and Debtors Private Prisons. It’s completely against Carlas Human and constitutional rights to be jailed for a debt she cannot afford and has no contract for.”
“Furthermore the High Court have ignored the fact neither the council nor the court have followed the correct legal due process and the arrest warrant used to arrest her – had HMRC printed on it [which was doesn’t exist anymore since 2011 – as its now HMCTS] and also made reference to ‘Petty Sessional Division’ – which is a jurisdiction abolished 43 years ago [1971 Senior Courts Act] – I hope that people take note of this and bare it in mind when they vote next May.”
Posted by warren knight at 08:04
Dear Home Secretary, Members of the Home Affairs Committee, Mr Robert Barrington , Ms Kathryn Hudson, Attorney General and Black and Ethnic Minority Members of Parliament
HOME AFFAIRS COMMITTEE TAKES EVIDENCE FROM THE HOME SECRETARY ON MONDAY 15TH DECEMBER 2014
THE UK’S THEFT OF LAND AND PROPERTY FROM ITS OWN PEOPLE AND THE STATE’S USE OF THE CIVIL COURTS TO COMMIT SERIOUS ORGANISED FRAUD
ANAL SHEIKH V THE LAW SOCIETY  EWHC 1409 (CH) , THE PURPORTED PROCEEDINGS OF ANAL SHEIKH V THE LAW SOCIETY  EWCA CIV 1577 , ANAL SHEIKH V THE LAW SOCIETY [2007 ] HL AND ANAL SHEIKH V THE UK GOVERNMENT 51144/07  ECHR 649 (23 APRIL 2010)
AN APPLICATION TO HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AND TO THE HOUSE TO IMPEACH THE RT. HON. THE LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS, A LORD JUSTICE OF APPEAL, THE HON. MR JUSTICE HENDERSON, A JUDGE OF THE CHANCERY DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, THE RT. HON. KENNETH CLARKE QC MP, AND THE RT. HON. MR CHRIS GRAYLING MP , INTER ALIA, FOR THE THEFT OF THE TITLE TO 37-47 STOKE NEWINGTON ROAD LONDON N16 8BJ , THE THEFT OF THE SHEIKH CHARGE AND FOR CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD (‘THE RED RIVER CONVEYANCING AND MORTGAGE FRAUD’)
REQUEST THAT THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION CONSIDERS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SANCTIONS OR RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AGAINST THE UK UNDER THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY (CFSP)
REPORT TO THE EUROPEAN ANTI- FRAUD OFFICE (OLAF) REPORT TO THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE ANTI-CORRUPTION GROUP (GRECO)
THE UK’S TORTURE OF ITS OWN PEOPLE IN VIOLATION OF THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT 1984
This letter can be viewed more conveniently in the following link]
These matters concern the theft of land and property by some of the most powerful individuals in the country, from some of the most vulnerable. The thefts take place through a network of corrupt judges and other public officials, bodies such as the Law Society , the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, the Bar Council and the Bar Standards Board, barristers, solicitors, banks, insurance companies and Government Agencies, such the Land Registry.
There are serious race issues involved and therefore I am sending this to all black and ethnic minority Members of the House to ask them to intervene.
The SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc , is a very simple bank scam.
The SRA’s Bank Scam – preparation of the fraudulent instrument
The SRA’s Bank Scam – use of the fraudulent instrument
The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud (See RR1 , RR2 and DOC 133 below) is a transparent land and mortgage fraud in which the Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Townley Featherstone Briggs, a judge of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales and member of the Privy Council (‘Briggs’) and the Hon. Sir Launcelot Dinadan James Henderson, a judge in the Chancery Division of the High Court of England and Wales (‘Henderson’ ) purporting to be members of the judiciary, or masquerading as such, or using their respective judicial titles and functions entered into a conspiracy to steal the title to the Stoke Newington Site and in pursuance of the conspiracy
1. fraudulently altered the title the Stoke Newington Site while the register was effectively frozen under the Land Registration Act 2002 s 72 (Priority Protection) which it is impossible to do
2. stole a legal mortgage document (the Sheikh Charge)
3. stole the title to the Stoke Newington Site
4. defrauded me and my client, who happened to be my mother, Mrs Rabia Sheikh
The objective of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud was
1. to steal £1.2m from me and my family which they knew I intended to spend in part to continue my challenge against the Law Society in the case of Anal Sheikh v The Law Society  EWHC 1409 (Ch) Anal Sheikh v The Law Society :  EWCA Civ 1577 . Anal Sheikh v United Kingdom 51144/07  ECHR 649 (23 April 2010 and
2. to appropriate the Stoke Newington Site which offered a substantial developmental potential , to develop it into a 100 unit residential and commercial development and to split the net revenues of about £64m between the fraudsters . The site is near the Olympic Stadium and new Dalston train connection which they knew would enhance its value.
A draft indictment against Lord Justice Briggs who impersonated a judge to commit a conveyancing and land registration fraud (the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud)
A draft indictment against Sir John Chadwick who impersonated a Court of Appeal Judge to further the Red River fraud (not yet prepared – it has just been discovered that he had retired in December 2007 but purported to dismiss an appeal against the Order of 2nd / Fraudulent Instrument of 2nd (which does not exist in law) in July 2008 in about ten lines)
Graphic illustration of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud
In summer vacation when the Royal Courts of Justice are closed they impersonated judges and staged enactments of trials. They put on their judicial robes , used empty courtrooms and bribed court staff to stand around to create the false appearance that a judicial process of some sort was being conducted.
It stands to reason that Sir Nicholas Phillips (Lord Chief Justice 02005-09-30-000030 September 2005 - 02008-10-01-00001 October 2008 ), Sir Igor Judge, (Lord Chief Justice 02005-09-30-00001 October 2008 - 02013-09-30-000030 September 2013) and Mr Kenneth Clarke MP QC, the former Minster of Justice, were at the very least aware of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and gave it the ‘green light’ ,if not orchestrated the entire fraud and have a personal financial stake in the Stoke Newington Site
The scheduling of the above session came to my attention only today, affording me no time to prepare submissions specifically for the Inquiry.
The best I can do in the circumstances is to send make these brief points.
The following should be treated as core documents
Submissions to the Constitution Committee UK’s fraud and money laundering: the cost and the consequences to the EU The Order of 2nd and the SRA’s Fraudulent Instrument : the greatest threat to the stability of Europe ever known in its history. PAGE 103-106 The State’s appropriation of rights in rem PAGE 106-107 UK’s withdrawal of a land registration system PAGE 107 The UK’s obstruction of the Free Movement of Capital and Asset Freezing 108 No entitlement in the UK to judgments in default of defence 108-111 The UK’s money laundering and use of tax havens 111-112 Allegations of corruption against Sir Nicholas Bratza and/or the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Anal Sheikh v United Kingdom 51144/07  ECHR 649 (23 April 2010 , the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and related cases. Sir Nicholas’ connection with Serle Court Chambers and with Lord Justice Briggs. Did the UK Government influence the ECHR in the prisoner’s votes cases and in the terrorist cases? 112-117 Is the economic impoverishment of the UK and itsincreased dependency on EU handouts deliberate ? 117-118 Does the UK practise slavery? 118 UK’s unlawful imprisonment and torture of its people 118-119 The UK’s suppression of claims against the State made under Francovich v Italy (1991) ECR 1 -5357 (1992) and Factorame & Ors R (on application of ) v SST [ 2002] EWCA CIV 932 119-120
Allegations against leading state officials of corruption, corruption in public office, theft, mortgage fraud, conspiracy to defraud, money laundering, trading in influence and other criminal offences against UK public officials Allegations against leading state officials of corruption, corruption in public office, theft, mortgage fraud, conspiracy to defraud, money laundering, trading in influence and other criminal offences against UK public officials Mr. Kenneth Clarke MP QC , Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice 12 May 2010 – 4 September 2012
121-125 Mr. Dominic Grieve QC MP, Attorney General for England and Wales May 2010 to July 2014 The Attorney General’s role and responsibility generally 125-126 Mr. Dominic Grieve and the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc. 126-127 Mr. Dominic Grieve’s false statement to a black solicitor constituent 127 Mr. Dominic Grieve and the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud 127-131
Mr. Dominic Grieve and the Bar Mutual Fraud 131-132 Mr. Dominic Grieve’s refusal to advise the Government in the UK Claim 132-133 Mr. Dominic Grieve and the late Mr. Lewis Nicholson 133-134 Mr. Dominic Grieve’s possible involvement in the suppression of a police investigation in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud 134-135 Mr. Dominic Grieve’s possible involvement in corruption in the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights 135-136 Does the Attorney General ‘take a cut’ of the proceeds of serious organised crime undertaken through the civil jurisdiction ? 136 The Rt Hon. The Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers PC, President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, October 2009 and October 2012, Lord Chief Justice 3 October 2005 – 30 September 2008 137-141 The Rt Hon. The Lord Judge , former Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge facilitates the second stage of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud in April 2010. 141-142 Lord Judge facilitates the third stage of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud in 2013-2014 142-148 lord Judge’s protection of Lord Justice Richards from prosecution on charges of sexual depravity as a quid pro quo for Lord Justice Richard’s protection of Briggs and the Bar Mutual Fraud 149-152 Other matters concerning Lord Judge 152-153
Representations against the purported refusal by the Clerk to the Committee , Mr Nick Besly, to accept my submissions
Core Document , a letter dated 17th August 2013 to Lord Igor Judge describing the modus operandi of State sponsored theft
1) Index and Key Pages, Documents, Meanings and References PAGE 29-49
2) PAGE 48-49 is a summary of the allegations against the State
3) The SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc and the race implications PAGE 50-73. UK5 PAGE 50 – 73, PAGE 151- 157, PAGE 220 -234, PAGE 238 -247 PAGE 281- 286
4) The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud PAGE 73 – 79
6) The State’s modus operandi. PAGE 81-115 showing how the State profiles, targets , and asset strips the Victim, and the State’s torture techniques DOC 20
7) Allegations against individuals of bribery and Corruption in Public Office PAGE 116-157
1. I am aware of Mr Vaz’ interest in the SRA. My specific representations to him are at UK5 PAGE 238 -247
In the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc. about 10,000 law firms have been raided and terminated on the back the SRA’s Fraudulent Instrument over the past 45 -50 years. As he is aware, the majority are BME firms. Countless millions of clients files and data has been stolen by the Law Society providing them with an unending supply of property to steal for decades to come I refer him to UK5 PAGE UK5 PAGE 151- 157, PAGE 220 -234, PAGE 281- 286,
The arbitrary and unlawful exercise of the SRA’s powers had has an enormous cost in human terms for the victims:
· In 2007 , Mrs Ranee Bassi a 48 year old married woman and mother of 3 children was found dead in her solicitor’s office after a four year probe, at the conclusion of which she was found honest. She had hung herself by the neck from the ceiling beams
· Mr Lawrence Mann, charged with dishonesty of a sum of about £5000.00, later found to be technical breach, shot himself and died . Records show that on the day before his suicide , a caseworker had telephoned Mr Mann and accused him of dishonesty.
· Solicitor Y committed suicide again after being accused of dishonesty.
· In 2011 Phillipa Knox, a solicitor, committed suicide.
He is referred to the following documents
Index to Response in the case of Anal Sheikh v UK Government  ECHR 649 (23 April 2010) 51144/07 and Ref 28863/11
Response in the case of Anal Sheikh v UK Government  ECHR 649 (23 April 2010) 51144/07 and Ref 28863/11 The legal arguments as to why I say all interventions are void are set out in DOC 8 PAGE 116 – PAGE 185 and details of the Compensation Fund Fraud and other frauds are set out in DOC 8 PAGE 185 – PAGE 207 . I argue that there is a possibility that the amendments effected over the years to the original statute may have been prompted financial and other considerations , by an ulterior motive and a hidden agenda. It is truly extraordinary that for the last forty five years the Law Society and the judiciary have mistakenly treated the Notice of Intervention, which anyone can see is an internal document generated by the Law Society, as a court order entitling the Law Society to close down firms and having the effect of freezing bank accounts, resulting not only in incalculable loss to the economy but causing human suffering of an order which is unimaginable in a modern democracy . The consequences if there were to be a similar misunderstanding in relation the proposed statute do not bear contemplation.
2. UK11 is my application to the Supreme Court made ex debito justiciae for a declaration that all interventions by the Law Society based on the SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Order are void and for permission for a class action
The Supreme Court has no choice but to grant the application and immediately it is granted all law firms which have been unlawfully closed down , which I estimate are as many as 10,000 can reopen and compensation paid to victims, both solicitors and their clients
I believe that these matters present the UK with an unprecedented opportunity to examine racism in an open and honest way leading to a fairer system of regulation and equality for solicitors ; and not only does it have the potential of achieving the most fundamental change the legal profession will have seen for over a 150 years ( since the days of Jinnah , Nehru and Gandhi) the rippling effect of its outcome will be seen in the other higher professions where discrimination is prevalent.
I have asked the Supreme Court to recommend that a public inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005 be conducted in relation to the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc addressing, inter alia, the following matters
1) By the case of In the Matter of the interventions into the solicitors’ practices known as Ahmed & Co, Biebuyck, Dixon & Co and the practices of Mr Zoi and In the Matter of Sections 35 and 36 and Schedules 1 and 2 of The Solicitors Act 1974 and In the Matter of the Law Society Compensation Fund Rules 1995 have the SRA unlawfully appropriated substantial residual balances belong to members of the public?
2) By the said case of Ahmed & Co, have the SRA unlawfully appropriated bona vacantia belonging to the Crown
3) Should Her Majesty the Queen be invited to intervene
I have also asked that the barristers involved in the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc
1) Be committed to prison for contempt of court in that they have
a) conspired with the SRA and others to commit the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc and or
b) misled the court, withheld evidence, fabricated evidence, made false and unarguable submissions, conspired with each other and with the SRA  and or
c) committed professional insurance fraud in that they know they have breached their duty of care and have been negligent but have withheld that fact from their professional insurers and or
d) conspired with their professional insurers to commit a fraud on the court by defending claims for breach of duty and in negligence and in fraud on sham and fraudulent grounds to avoid indemnifying the client, splitting the insurance proceeds instead
2) That they be referred to the Crown Prosecution Service and or the Director of Public Prosecution for prosecution for other criminal offences
3) That they be referred to the Bar Standards Board or to the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, as appropriate, with a recommendation that they be debarred or struck off, as appropriate.
4) That they pay part or all of the Reparation for the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc personally
The barristers include
1) Mr Hodge Malek QC of 39 Essex Street, London WC2R 3AT (Counsel for the Law Society in the High Court )
2) Mr Gregory Treverton Jones of 39 Essex Street, London WC2R 3AT (Counsel for me in the High Court and in the Court of Appeal )
3) Mr Timothy Dutton QC of Fountain Court Chambers Fountain Court Temple London EC4Y 9DH (Counsel for the Law Society in the Court of Appeal and in the House of Lords )
4) Mr Hugo Page QC of Blackstone Chambers Blackstone House Temple London EC4Y 9BW (Counsel for me in the House of Lords and at the SDT )
5) Mr Jonathan Harvie QC of Blackstone Chambers Blackstone House Temple London EC4Y 9BW (Counsel for me in the House of Lords )
6) Ms Patricia Robertson QC of Fountain Court Chambers Fountain Court Temple London EC4Y 9DH (Counsel for the Law Society in the SDT and in the High Court [Appeal from the SDT] [Judicial Review of SDT Hearing])
The Supreme Court has not even acknowledged receipt.
3. Mr Chris Ruane is referred to UK5 PAGE 247 in which I discuss the connection between the SRA and Burges Salmon, who should be of interest to him
4. At UK5 PAGE 196-219 I argue that in Britain today black and ethnic minority individuals are considered to be corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and fundamentally unfit for the higher professions and for public office and in 21st century, a white lawyer can enslave black and ethnics lawyers
5. The Home Secretary gave evidence to EU Sub- Committee E that the National Crime Agency is Britain’s response to tackling serious organised fraud and Britain really does not need the EPPO’’s office to involve itself in Britain’s criminal justice system (see video link at http://www.parliamentlive.
The NCA REPORT and draft indictments appearing above were subsequently sent to the National Crime Agency and the Crown Prosecution Service in order to test the Home Secretary’s evidence. They show how arrests could be made immediately, charges could be preferred within a few minutes of arrest and that convictions are guaranteed
The response I received from NCA’s shows that the Home Secretary blatantly misled the Committee
As things stand, there appears to be no criminal law enforcement agency in the UK at all for economic crime. Nor is there any means of challenging false evidence given in a Lords Select Committee Inquiry.
6. The Queen’s Speech this year announced in introduction of the Modern Slavery Bill and Serious Crime Bill. The Home Secretary commented
Serious and organised crime blights lives and causes misery within communities across the UK.
The Serious Crime Bill would provide law enforcement agencies with greater powers to prosecute those responsible.
Modern slavery is an appalling crime that has no place in today’s society.
The Modern Slavery Bill, the first of its kind in Europe, represents an historic opportunity to get new legislation on the statute books and reflects the Government’s determination to lead the global fight against this evil.
The Home Office Minister for Modern Slavery and Organised Crime Karen Bradley MP has said:
"Nobody is above the law. But for too long corrupt lawyers, accountants and other professionals have tried to evade justice by hiding behind a veneer of respectability.
"This new offence sends out a clear message to those individuals - if you are helping to oil the wheels of organised crime, you will be prosecuted and face being jailed."
That is not true. There are many people who are above the law.
If I am wrong, would she please send a police officer to all of the defendants named in the draft indictments RR1, SRA1 SRA2 BMIF 1 MG1 this afternoon and have them arrested and charged
7. If Mrs May will not do what is asked of her in the above paragraph
1) Would she concede that her conduct would lead to at the very least to a loss of public confidence and at the worst to the public perception that she herself is party to these frauds and takes a cut of the proceeds in each case. In the Red River fraud for example the public might believe that she has accepted 10 of the 100 units in exchange for protecting the Red River Conspirators ?
2) Will she resign ?
3) Will she herself submit to a criminal inquiry ?
Posted by warren knight at 08:01